[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @ if html uref suggestion
From: |
Marc Herbert |
Subject: |
Re: @ if html uref suggestion |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2000 17:52:52 +0100 (CET) |
On Fri, 10 Nov 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> A shortened URL will only work if there are clearly visible links from
> the parent page all the way to the target page. Many times, these
> links either don't exist or are hard to spot, because the text of the
> links is not unequivocal enough.
I do aggree: my suggestion is not useful when dealing with the "many
times" badly designed web sites. The problem is, there are some well
designed web sites out there !
Example : I'am talking about Gigabit Ethernet, and I want to point to
the Vitesse web site:
@uref{
http://www.xaqti.com/products/gigabit.htm,
http://www.xaqti.com/,
Vitesse
}
- The first link is more direct and more useful in the HTML version.
- The second link is more elegant and even more practical to use in
the paper version (less typing and only two clicks added).
> Personally, I really get pissed off when I find out that a URL in a
> document is incorrect or inaccurate.
That's another good argument in favor of my suggestion, thanks for it!
-> as paper documents have a longer lifetime than HTML ones, it's a
good idea to use in them more general URLs than in HTML, because more
general URLs also have a longer lifetime than more specific ones.
> > and then they take too much time to type.
>
> Note that the feature you are asking for doesn't save any typing: you
> type both the long URL *and* the short one.
For sure, but I was still talking about the *paper reader* typing the
URL (with her mittens) and not the writer. Documents writers are used
to spend lot of time to make reading more efficient.
> That said, I don't mind to add the feature if it is useful for
> someone. Please consider submitting a description of the feature for
> the Texinfo manual with rationale for it; I think it won't be easy for
> us to explain why it is needed.
>
OK, I will write something. I will "patch" the existing paragraph.
Should I send this to this same list (bug-texinfo) or somewhere else ?
Is there some formal procedure for this described somewhere ?
The footnote idea from Akim is also interesting. But quite
orthogonal. In fact I see two problems with "URLs on paper" :
- where and how should they be displayed ? (parentheses,
footnotes,...)
- can they be different from the one in the HTML version ?
Sincerely,
--
Marc Herbert
"Si Dieu existe, c'est une affaire sérieuse. Et s'il n'existe pas... c'est
encore plus grave" - Bono
Re: @ if html uref suggestion, Akim Demaille, 2000/11/10