[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: generated manpages
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: generated manpages |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:57:01 +0200 (IST) |
On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, josX wrote:
> >If the information is already in the Info manual, and is just copied
> >into the man page, what's the value of that? How is this different
> >from "info --usage"?
>
> I could just an easily say: "If the information is already in the program
> through the '--help' and '--version' arguments, and is just copied
> into the man page, what's the value of that? How is this different
> from "PROGRAM --help/version | less"?"
It isn't. It's a stopgap, no more, no less.
> The info inside `info ls` would make a damn fine standard
> manpage, why did you guys ever start with that 'info' thing.
> `man` is extremely straighforward, why bother with all the menus...just
> confusing...
You don't (and shouldn't) go through the menus, except when you read
about the package for the first time. After that, use the manual as a
reference, by using the `i' command which searches in the manual indices.
That's what I do, and I usually find what I'm looking for in a matter of
seconds.
> I'm heavily thinking about translating `info ls` into nroff and distributing
> it as the Dutch manpage for ls.
It's free software.