Re: Documentation bugs in 2.53

[Paul Eggert]

> From: Akim Demaille <address@hidden>
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
> 
> I still don't plan to do that.  There are other nodes in the
> documentation that don't make sense without the dot.
> 
> ~ace/doc % grep 'address@hidden' autoconf.texi
> @node Writing configure.ac
> @node configure.ac Layout
> @node config.status Invocation
> @node Obsolete config.status Use
> @node acconfig.h
> @node Autoconf 2.13
> @node AC_LIBOBJ vs. LIBOBJS
> @node Writing testsuite.at

These can all be rewritten to avoid the '.'.  For example:

@node Writing Autoconf Input
@node Autoconf Input Layout
@node Recreating a Configuration
@node Obsolete Configuration Recreation
@node Header Templates
@node Older Versions of Autoconf 2
@node AC_LIBOBJ versus LIBOBJS
@node Writing Test Suite Macros

In some cases the rewritten versions are technically more correct,
e.g. the first node talks about 'configure.in' as well as 'configure.ac'.

I realize that it cramps one's style somewhat, but it is the standard....