[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cross manual references in html manuals, second
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: cross manual references in html manuals, second |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 12:00:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 10:14:55AM -0400, Karl Berry wrote:
> @equiv equiv OR ==
>
> I think the symbolic representation (==) would be better than the word
> `equiv'.
it seems that Texinfo's @equiv is the same symbol as TeX's \equiv.
\equiv in plain TeX typesets a symbol which consists of three parallel
lines.
I used to use that symbol to typeset congruence, ie.
$ a \equiv b\ ({\rm mod}\ 6)$
was the statement which you'd express this way in C:
a % 6 == b % 6
Maybe other people use it to express another kind of equivalence, but
it doesn't mean the same thing as ``='' or ``==''.
Have a nice day,
Stepan