Re: Ugly deffn

[Akim Demaille]

 >     1. deffnx in texinfo.tex appears to have broken parsing rules: see the
 >        "Dragon Book" in dvi.

 > It sure does.  I suspect a number of the @def commands are broken in
 > this regard.  There are some hacks to handled multiword braced arguments
 > in a few cases, but I never tested it exhaustively.  Stepan and I have
 > been discussing it.  He is writing a new implementation of @def... for
 > texinfo.tex.  So, unless it's urgent for you, I'll wait ... ?

I can wait, no problem!  That's readable :)


 >     2. the resulting of small-caps'ing cumulated with bold does not yield
 >        nice results neither in html nor dvi/pdf.  See STL below.

 > I agree, very ugly.[...]  I do not see an easy fix offhand.

:)

 > Bletch, bletch, bletch.  Thanks for the reports.  I guess :).

No problem, pal :)

 > (Not to mention bibliographies should really be supported via BibTeX in
 > the first place ...)

Yeah...  Someday maybe :)