bug-texinfo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: texinfo.tex CVS 2003-11-24


From: Karl Berry
Subject: Re: texinfo.tex CVS 2003-11-24
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:40:18 -0500

    I'm not referring to Roman vs. tt, but really about tt vs. bold tt.

Unfortunately there is no (standard) bold tt font, or I would use it.
Regular cmtt is already pretty bold, so I figured ...

Bold roman can still be achieved with @b, as in
@defun @b{bold-name}

Since the @def... commands are supposedly for identifiers, I think tt is
the better default.

Fonts are painful.






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]