[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Section number increments
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: Section number increments |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:24:47 -0500 |
the TeX problem (see below) is fixed by the patch
I am not sure this is the right change.
The code in texinfo.tex didn't take into account that numbered and
unnumbered sectioning could be mixed.
I don't really care if pdf xrefs fail when numbered/unnumbered sections
are mixed, since that's very unusual. I never saw any real documents
that needed to do that -- Jesper, what does your real document look
like?
However, I don't want pdf xrefs to fail in the usual case, where
numbered/unnumbered aren't mixed, and I think without the section number
resetting, they will. I'll have to look at it again (next week).
Does the second @subsubsection have number 1.0.0.2, or again 1.0.0.1 ?
1.0.0.2, definitely. I'll fix the doc.
Thanks.
- Section number increments, Jesper Harder, 2004/02/19
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/19
- Re: Section number increments, Alper Ersoy, 2004/02/19
- Re: Section number increments, Stepan Kasal, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Dumas Patrice, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: Section number increments, Dumas Patrice, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Jesper Harder, 2004/02/20
- Re: Section number increments, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/21
- Re: Section number increments, Jesper Harder, 2004/02/21
- Re: Section number increments, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/02/21
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/23
- Re: Section number increments, Laurence Finston, 2004/02/24
- Re: Section number increments, Karl Berry, 2004/02/24