Re: texi2dvi: More functions

[Karl Berry]

Hi Akim,

    reading $TEXINPUTS helped

I have no problem with reporting $TEXINPUTS after absolutification, but
I have some questions about other parts of the patch:

(1) do we really gain that much by making verbose a function?  I guess
    $0 might be helpful in the output, although you could also argue
    that it is additional noise.

(2) I'm not sure verbose output should go to stderr.

(3) I was under the possibly erroneous impression that
funcname ()
{
  is not sufficiently portable.
}

  that is, the { has to be on the same line (or the newline escaped by a \).
  I'm sure this was true at one time, although I can't say any more what
  version of what system I was using.

Thanks,
k