[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info -f does not ignore ./
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: info -f does not ignore ./ |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:18:26 -0500 |
So I stand by the claim that 'info' is the only program to treat a pathname
'dir/foo' differently from './dir/foo', and that is confusing for the user.
TeX does, not that I think that is especially relevant. I haven't
checked gs and other programs that look in search paths, instead of just
in single directories; it wouldn't surprise me if they obey search paths.
Are people actually using subdirectories of elements of INFOPATH?
No.
would mean that you could fix 3) without causing trouble to the users.
I moved . to the beginning of DEFAULT_INFOPATH in info/filesys.h.
Now info -f subdir/somefile finds ./subdir/somefile.info ok.
(In current Texinfo CVS.)
info -f somefile still looks for somefile in the dir file though, in
preference to finding ./somefile :(. Maybe someday ...
k
- info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Karl Berry, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Karl Berry, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Karl Berry, 2005/03/08
- the "info" command, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/09
- Re: the "info" command, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/09
- Re: the "info" command, Karl Berry, 2005/03/10
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08