[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: info -f does not ignore ./
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: info -f does not ignore ./ |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Mar 2005 21:54:06 +0200 |
> From: Bruno Haible <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 13:45:28 +0100
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
>
> Karl Berry wrote:
> > 'info' is the only program to treat pathnames this way.
> >
> > In the shell, if you type "foo", it will search along PATH for foo, not
> > automatically and unchangeably look for ./foo; . is not treated specially.
>
> But in the shell, if you type "dir/foo", it will _not_ search anywhere:
> it will only look in dir/.
That's because executable programs are all lumped into a single
directory, while Info's search provides for subdirectories.
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, (continued)
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Karl Berry, 2005/03/07
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Karl Berry, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Karl Berry, 2005/03/08
- the "info" command, Stepan Kasal, 2005/03/09
- Re: the "info" command, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/09
- Re: the "info" command, Karl Berry, 2005/03/10
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Bruno Haible, 2005/03/08
- Re: info -f does not ignore ./, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/03/08