[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:13:16 -0600 |
Can you please describe the situation where texi2dvi is run on a
directory tree like the comment above suggests? I didn't think this
could happen.
I believe a LaTeX document might be set up that way. However, perhaps
cp -pr would be simpler.
The problem with this replacement is that on non-Posix platforms it
requires yet another ported utility (Tar)
Which is everywhere, right? I find it quite hard to imagine a system,
even MS-DOS, which has sufficient support to run texi2dvi (e.g., has
tex), but lacks tar.
and a very reliable support in the shell for Posix-style
(command...) semantics.
It's a pretty basic shell construct. Either the shell is implemented or
not. If it's not, I doubt texi2dvi will run at all. Heck, it makes use
of tons of user-defined functions now, which are a lot more obscure
feature than | and &&.
Unless you're saying you know it doesn't work in your shell, but I doubt
that's the case.
I'm most concerned by the set -e, myself.
Best,
karl
- texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/09
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Karl Berry, 2006/01/09
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/09
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/09
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/11
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Karl Berry, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Karl Berry, 2006/01/10
- Re: texi2dvi: set -e, use tar, Akim Demaille, 2006/01/11