Re: annoying `note' warnings

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 04 May 2006 09:11:32 +0200 (CEST)
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden>
> 
> > > We sometimes use "note" in a different way, in the sense of a musical 
> > > note.
> > 
> > Okay, but then why does it have to be in @strong?
> 
> Why not?  We use it as documented:

We are miscommunicating.  The suggestion to reword was met with ``we
cannot do this in this manual'', so I asked for examples which cannot
be reworded.  If the only change that's needed to avoid the problem
is to replace @strong with @emph or some such, that's a good solution,
IMHO, it doesn't even qualify as rewording.

> What do you think of a address@hidden' instruction, something like
> 
>   @address@hidden value}}

Warnings are either useful or not.  If they aren't useful, they should
be removed; if they are useful, then turning them off goes against
their introduction in the first place.

>   @node breve
>   @section breve
> 
>   @strong{note value}, twice as long as a whole note.  Mainly used in
>   pre-1650 music.

Will @emph do?