Re: Making it possible to extend implicit INFOPATH

[Benno Schulenberg]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Reuben Thomas <address@hidden>
> >
> > I had assumed that "info info" was the manual for the
> > standalone reader, as its command is "info", but I now notice
> > that that's wrong, which is confusing.

It is indeed confusing.  I request that this be changed.

> > It could usefully be mentioned in the top node of info.info
>
> It's mentioned in the "Advanced" node.

It would be much better to mention it up front.  "There are two 
primary Info readers: `info', a stand-alone program designed just 
to read Info files (*note GNU Info: (info-stnd)), ..."

By the way, in the third paragraph of 'info info' the command `h' is 
mentioned for the programmed instruction sequence, but this isn't 
correct any more for the current standalone Info reader, which uses 
`H' for that.

Benno