Re: Making it possible to extend implicit INFOPATH

[Karl Berry]

1. Sounds sensible to add an xref to info-stnd to the Top node of
   info.info.  I'll do that.  (I'm not entirely sure if that's what was
   being suggested, too many pronouns.)

2. I don't think renaming info-stnd to info makes sense, as we already
   discussed.  (Also, it's not up to me.)  We did change info --usage info
   (in 4.12) to show info-stnd, as you may recall.  I don't see any
   other practical change tomake.

3. Surely most new users reading the documentation want to learn how to
   read Info documents.  That is precisely what "info info" will tell them.

4. No doubt info-stnd could use work, and volunteers are welcome.  It is
   nowhere on my list.

karl