[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: @item and @tab space in lists and tables
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: @item and @tab space in lists and tables |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2008 10:38:49 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 06:41:34PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
> > Within @example-like environments, ...
>
> ... At least in @multitable and @table I'd have said that spaces
> following @*item and @tab should be removed, and spaces and newlines
> at the end of the @item or @tab argument removed too.
>
> Well, I agree that is the desirable behavior. Actually, I suspect the
> ideal would be to ignore spaces after any non-delimited command, just as
> they are outside @example, and @*item and @tab are just the ones that
> the Lilypond manual has run into. For instance, @*index, @set, ...
If I recall well we have already agreed about that, when I asked many
question about where @value and @macro should be expanded.
> And for @enumerate and @itemize leave things unspecified.
>
> Why leave it unspecified for those if it's specified for @*table?
>
> Anyway, I'm not ready to specify it for anything until I figure out if I
When I say 'specify' it is not to say that we grave it in stone, but
merely that we agree among ourselves that it is the best way.
> can reasonably implement any of this in texinfo.tex. Explicitly writing
> code to ignore spaces anywhere that TeX "normally" ignores spaces seems
> pretty much like a nightmare to me.
Indeed.
> If you want to implement the space/newline-ignoring for texi2html (or if
> it already behaves that way), that is all to the good.
After more thinking, I think that removing spaces is right in html, but
in xml it is better to keep them. In docbook I don't know, and in info
keeps things as is.
--
Pat