[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: serious flaw of @c
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: serious flaw of @c |
Date: |
Sun, 23 Nov 2008 17:31:26 -0600 |
In other words, you would like to replace @macro with a new command
which provides a better syntax,
Yes. (Modulo the external m4/cpp idea.)
but on the other hand, the current makeinfo syntax should be
retained, regardless how painful it is to implement, right?
Yes, we have to keep the existing @macro (and @set/@clear/@value,
another kludge). We know many existing documents use them, and when
they suffice, that's fine.
karl
- serious flaw of @c, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/21
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Karl Berry, 2008/11/21
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/21
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Karl Berry, 2008/11/21
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/22
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Karl Berry, 2008/11/23
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Patrice Dumas, 2008/11/25
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/25
- Re: serious flaw of @c, Werner LEMBERG, 2008/11/22
- Re: serious flaw of @c,
Karl Berry <=