[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[SPAM] Re: texinfo Makefile.am
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
[SPAM] Re: texinfo Makefile.am |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:38:01 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.2i |
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:18:50PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> +dist-hook:
> + tar -C $(srcdir) -c -f - --exclude CVS tp | tar -C $(distdir) -x -f -
>
> Why do we want tp in the dist at this point? As far as I understand
> from Patrice, it's not ready. And when it is ready, it will be merged
> into the configure stuff in the standard way.
I am still unsure how easy it is. I did a little bit of investigations
when I started tp/ on integrating a perl module (which is what tp/ basically
is) with autoconf/automake but I found nothing obvious. Also if tp/ is
to be distributed separately too (which I think would be nice) there should
also certainly be some adjustments.
> And yes, there are lots and lots of tests for make distcheck to go
> through. I don't know if it's feasible or desirable to omit the
> lengthiest ones. I'm sure I will want to figure that out when we get to
> the glorious day of actually making a new distribution :).
Right now those are the tests of texi2html that are run, not those of
tp/. Current tp tests are much better focused, and, in addition, tp is
a bit faster. Parser, Info and Plaintext tests are already done, and they
don't take too much time, in my opinion.
In any case, I fully agree that current texi2html tests are much too long,
I even think that they almost become detrimental for the developpement...
--
Pat