[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 11:06:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:17:57PM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> CVS makeinfo gives a lots of warnings as in the Subject.
> Are these waenings needed? I find cross-references in a @deffn useful,
> to link to the corresponding definition. For example:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/Defining-new-classes.html
The result is indeed interesting. Does it look good in direct
html/dvi/pdf too?
> Or is these some better way?
I don't think so.
The only problem I see is that the Info output is certainly ugly.
However, I'd be in favor of removing the warning as the result is likely
to be clean in other formats and I think that if the output is ugly in
Info it is because of limitations of the Info format.
Karl?
--
Pat
- warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Per Bothner, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Per Bothner, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Per Bothner, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Karl Berry, 2012/07/22
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/22
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/21
Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Karl Berry, 2012/07/22