|
From: | Per Bothner |
Subject: | Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jul 2012 10:37:25 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/14.0 |
On 07/21/2012 02:06 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 10:17:57PM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:CVS makeinfo gives a lots of warnings as in the Subject. Are these waenings needed? I find cross-references in a @deffn useful, to link to the corresponding definition. For example: http://www.gnu.org/software/kawa/Defining-new-classes.htmlThe result is indeed interesting. Does it look good in direct html/dvi/pdf too?
Alas - it looks good - but wrong. Instead of:define-class class-name (supers ...) (annotation|option-pair)* field-or-method-decl ... [Syntax]
I get:define-class class-name (supers ...) (|)) ... [Syntax]
I.e. the refs don't generate anything at all. -- --Per Bothner address@hidden http://per.bothner.com/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |