[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:39:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 10:37:25AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> >
> >The result is indeed interesting. Does it look good in direct
> >html/dvi/pdf too?
>
> Alas - it looks good - but wrong.
>
> Instead of:
>
> define-class class-name (supers ...) (annotation|option-pair)*
> field-or-method-decl ... [Syntax]
>
> I get:
>
> define-class class-name (supers ...) (|)) ... [Syntax]
>
> I.e. the refs don't generate anything at all.
What output format are you referring to? I don't see that in HTML, nor
in pdf...
--
Pat
- warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Per Bothner, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Per Bothner, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Per Bothner, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/21
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Karl Berry, 2012/07/22
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Patrice Dumas, 2012/07/22
- Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn,
Patrice Dumas <=
Re: warning: @ref should not appear in @deffn, Karl Berry, 2012/07/22