[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (info browser) Should any default directories be used when INFOPATH
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: (info browser) Should any default directories be used when INFOPATH is set? |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Apr 2014 22:11:15 GMT |
Hi Gavin,
I would like to have a self-contained set of info files which
the program can read, without any interference from any which have
already been installed
Definitely a necessity.
This would seem to contradict the manual:
You are right.
My reading of this is that no extra default search directories are
used when INFOPATH is set. Unless there's a good reason for it, I
propose to stop info doing this.
Because this behavior has been around so long, I fear that people
setting INFOPATH now are likely to expect the merging with system
directories, despite the documentation. In other words, let's treat it
as a doc bug and not a code bug.
Therefore, I think we should change the documentation for INFOPATH to
say that it does do the merging (as well as the "extra colon"
expansion), and invent a new variable to define the entire info path
without any additional defaults (no need for colon expansion there, I
think). Sound reasonable?
The variable name that comes to mind is INFOPATH_OVERRIDE, not that I'm
especially thrilled by it :).
?
Thanks,
Karl