[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: makeinfo bug
From: |
Dumas Patrice |
Subject: |
Re: makeinfo bug |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Aug 2014 10:20:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:30:44PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> Also, I am not sure we should add a test for it. If we do, then we
> should also add a test for every command-line option and I am not
> sure we want that.
>
> Why not?
>
> Anyway, I don't think we're necessarily obliged to test every single
> cmdline option, and it wouldn't even be possible to test every
> combination. But I see no particular reason not to add tests to make
> sure bugs don't come back.
Ok, but I think that there is no reason for a specific command line option
related bug to come back, in contrast with bugs in parsing/converting.
Bug related with command line options, in general, are not caused by
interactions with other changes, and therefore should not be prone to
regressions.
--
Pat