[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: real subscripts and superscripts?
From: |
Dumas Patrice |
Subject: |
Re: real subscripts and superscripts? |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:33:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) |
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 07:08:48PM +0100, Dumas Patrice wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 11:07:04PM +0000, Karl Berry wrote:
> > Maybe I would favor using x^{2}y in textual context too, since there is
> > no good solution, and it is simpler to implement and explain ...
> >
> > Ok by me. Doing the simple way (always add braces) first seems
> > reasonable; if it turns out that the feature gets used enough and people
> > really don't like it, the output can always be tweaked later.
> >
> > I can add these to texinfo.tex and texinfo.texi, etc., easily enough.
> > Do you have time to add it to makeinfo?
>
> Yes. For HTML cross manual I propose doing the same as for "style"
> commands and key and kbd, that is replace by the content.
Also in raw text, I propose using content as is without any formatting
(used for instance for file names, for index sorting).
--
Pat
Re: real subscripts and superscripts?, Karl Berry, 2014/11/27
Re: real subscripts and superscripts?, Karl Berry, 2014/11/28