[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: real subscripts and superscripts?

From: Per Bothner
Subject: Re: real subscripts and superscripts?
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 16:51:49 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

On 12/01/2014 04:31 PM, Karl Berry wrote:
The remaining question would be about @sup/@sub outside
of math -- go into math by default, or stay in text?  I would be
inclined toward the latter (which is also what texi2any does now).

I think the latter makes most sense: it seems more useful and consistent.
It is maybe *slightly* easier to implement @sup{TEXT} as $^{TEXT}$
rather than \superscript{TEXT} or whatever, but it can't be that difficult
to implement a suitable \superscript macro.
        --Per Bothner
address@hidden   http://per.bothner.com/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]