[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texi2html output validity
From: |
Ineiev |
Subject: |
Re: texi2html output validity |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Dec 2014 12:30:33 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 02:09:33AM +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Ineiev writes:
>
> > GNU webmasters did receive reports from such visitors. I'm sure many
> > cases were not reported.
>
> If GNU websites are correctly configured and send the correct MIME
> charset in the Content-Type in the HTTP headers, the users should not
> have a problem,
I don't think it's easy to correctly configure www.gnu.org because
different pages written in the same language and living in the same
directory may use different encodings. they still use EUC-KR,
iso-8859-2, gb2312, and more.
> > I think I don't understand this. do you suggest that webmasters
> > provide two versions of pages for the users to select them
> > manually,
>
> Definitely not. The web is not the problem (see above). The issue
> (if any) is local copies where the HTTP Content-Type header is
> unavailable.
Still it's an issue.
- Re: texi2html output validity, (continued)
- Re: texi2html output validity, Patrice Dumas, 2014/12/23
- Re: texi2html output validity, David Kastrup, 2014/12/23
- Re: texi2html output validity, Yuri Khan, 2014/12/23
- Re: texi2html output validity, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/24
- Re: texi2html output validity, Ineiev, 2014/12/25
- Re: texi2html output validity, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/26
- Re: texi2html output validity, Ineiev, 2014/12/25
- Re: texi2html output validity, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/26
- Re: texi2html output validity,
Ineiev <=
- Re: texi2html output validity, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2014/12/26
- Re: texi2html output validity, Ineiev, 2014/12/25
- Re: texi2html output validity, Gavin Smith, 2014/12/23
- Re: texi2html output validity, Patrice Dumas, 2014/12/23