[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available] |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 15:03:57 +0100 |
On 24 June 2015 at 14:43, Patrice Dumas <address@hidden> wrote:
> The reason why some elements only are allowed is to generate valid
> DocBook, as in <synopsis> not everything is accepted. I do not remember
> if <subscript> is allowed or not, I may have forgotten to add it. If it
> is not allowed, however, I think that inconsistent-looking output is
> better than invalid DocBook...
Good point. I've found the following documentation for <synopsis>
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/synopsis.html
It looks like <superscript> and <subscript> are allowed. See Children
section, following "The following elements occur in synopsis".
Other tags that are also listed, but are not allowed at the moment by
DocBook.pm, are
citetitle, literal, command, firstterm, footnote, userinput, keycap, option
I'd suggest these be added, unless I am missing something.
Not allowed in <synopsis> and correctly not allowed DocBook.pm:
<mathphrase>
- texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available, Gavin Smith, 2015/06/20
- Re: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/20
- Re: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available, Gavin Smith, 2015/06/23
- Re: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available, Eli Zaretskii, 2015/06/23
- bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available], Per Bothner, 2015/06/23
- Re: bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available], Gavin Smith, 2015/06/24
- Re: bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available], Patrice Dumas, 2015/06/24
- Re: bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available],
Gavin Smith <=
- Re: bug in @sub output in docbook [was: texinfo-5.9.96 pretest available], Gavin Smith, 2015/06/25