|
From: | David Kastrup |
Subject: | Re: backslashes, macros, indexes, texinfo |
Date: | Mon, 17 Aug 2015 21:14:43 +0200 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes: > Gavin Smith <address@hidden> writes: > >> On 15 August 2015 at 20:27, Gavin Smith <address@hidden> wrote: >>> Here's another patch. >> >> It's been pointed out to me that this patch doesn't apply cleanly. It >> should be okay if you ignore the failed hunks, otherwise try the >> attached. > > With that patch, compilation of the LilyPond documentation completes and > looks correct at a cursory viewing. I have currently taken Texinfo from svn://svn.savannah.gnu.org/texinfo/address@hidden and it apparently compiles LilyPond documentation. Before checking it into the LilyPond repository (which will lead to more thorough feedback in about two weeks of time when it has percolated to a developer release): is that a sensible point of reference? Or should I rather wait some more before synching? -- David Kastrup
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |