[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XeTeX encoding problem
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: XeTeX encoding problem |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:11:29 +0000 |
On 20 March 2016 at 19:43, Gavin Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> but I want to understand what the point of the \edef was in the first
> place, and what the point was of changing the catcode of backslash,
> and test whether this is still necessary. Hopefully I'll get to this
> soon.
I've committed a new change that should make special Unicode
characters work again in @copying. Please let me know if there are any
problems. Thanks.
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Gavin Smith, 2016/03/06
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, trueroad, 2016/03/07
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/20
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/20
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Gavin Smith, 2016/03/20
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/21
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem,
Gavin Smith <=
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/22
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/22
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Gavin Smith, 2016/03/22
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/23
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Gavin Smith, 2016/03/22
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Karl Berry, 2016/03/25
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Gavin Smith, 2016/03/26
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Karl Berry, 2016/03/28
- Re: XeTeX encoding problem, Masamichi HOSODA, 2016/03/27