[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: --vi-keys is misdocumented
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: --vi-keys is misdocumented |
Date: |
Mon, 15 May 2017 17:31:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 08:18:14PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 01:42:16PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> > Furthermore, why does b do scroll-backward, and f do
> > scroll-forward-page-only? Why the asymmetry?
>
> I don't know. I would assume it was a mistake. It was like that
> in every old version I checked. We should probably change it.
So looking at the documentation from old versions, it looks like
it was intended to be 'scroll-backward-page-only'
<PREVIOUS> (arrow key) (`scroll-backward-page-only')
<PRIOR> (arrow key)
`M-v'
`b', vi-like operation
`C-b', vi-like operation
Shift the text in this window down. The inverse of
`scroll-forward-page-only'. Does not scroll beyond the start of
the current node. The default scroll size can be changed by
invoking the(`scroll-backward-page-only-set-window') command, `w'
under `--vi-keys', with a numeric argument.
I will change it accordingly.