[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
some more little things about --vi-keys
From: |
Benno Schulenberg |
Subject: |
some more little things about --vi-keys |
Date: |
Sun, 21 May 2017 12:49:17 +0200 |
When doing 'info/ginfo doc/info-stnd.info cus inf'
it says:
\xr xref-item
I think that should be "^xr".
When the last line of the .infokey file does not end
in a newline, its contents are not processed.
Maybe bind ":1" and ":$" to beginning-of-node and
end-of-node?
I think it would be nicer to list only the bindings that
actually mimic the behavior of vim. So, not f and b and
d and u, but only ^f and ^v and ^d and ^u. And not ^j
nor ^m nor ^y, but just ^e and ^k.
But if you want to list all things that are actually
bound differently in vi mode, then maybe the extra
bindings after an "#additional bindings" comment line?
It would be better to list the bindings in some logical
order, and to put the most frequently used first. So I
would suggest to put them in this order in one block:
^e ^k ^d ^u ^f ^b :$ :1 G gg.
Then the next-node to dir-node ones in one block, as
it is now. Then the rest, while trimming some duplicates.
And then after ZZ a block of #additional bindings.
Actually \kd and \ku do not mimic vim but less... It's
too late to change now, but for someone familiar with vim
this might be... off-putting.
And finally, when it's not really possible to rebind ^c,
it's probably better to not list it there at all?
Benno
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Access your email from home and the web
- some more little things about --vi-keys,
Benno Schulenberg <=