[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentati
From: |
Per Bothner |
Subject: |
Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation? |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Apr 2019 08:31:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
On 4/2/19 2:37 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Yet I’m not completely sold to the everything in the browser approach,
and everything in JavaScript. In an ideal world (for me), we’d rather
provide a local documentation viewer
I don't think we're aiming for "everything in the browser". A closer
approximation is "everything using html+javascript". I.e. using html
as the file type and JavaScript as the UI implementation language.
That does not require a traditional desktop browser: You can write
a nice desktop application using Electron, or Qt (QtWebEngine),
or Gtk (WebKitGTK), or Java (JavaFX/WebView). You use one of these
toolkits to create a top-level window, with whatever "chrome" (window
frame, menus etc), but most of UI would be in JavaScript. (I do have
a nice pure-JavaScript implementation of menus (menubar and popup), BTW.)
I have a lot of experience doing something similar for the DomTerm terminal
emulator (https://domterm.org): Display management, escape sequence
parsing, keyboard command processing are all handled by JavasScript.
This JavaScript can run in a regular browser (Firefox and Chrome and
been tested most) or using an Electron or Qt wrapper. It works very
well - using Electron or Qt it looks and acts just like a regular terminal
emulator. You start it up with a 'domterm' command, which depending on the
command-line switches forks a pty and creates an Electron/Qt/browser window.
that renders Texinfo directly.
That's a lot of work, and I see little benefit to it.
When talking about ease of access, we can’t ignore keyword searches.
How would you do ‘info -k’? How would you even simply point your
browser to a specific manual? What about inter-manual cross-references?
You can still have an 'info' command, which would parse the command-line,
find the appropriate html file, and then start up an Electron/Qt/browser
window.
If running under DomTerm or similar, the 'info' command can even re-use the
existing terminal window. See the output from 'domterm help' in the
top-right pane of the first screenshot at http://domterm.org/index.html .
Would we need a mechanism similar to ‘hxmlxref.cnf’ but that would
browse local manuals? What would be the recommended solution for Emacs
and console users?
I think the best approach for Emacs is a hybrid of eww and info modes:
Instead of reading an info file, it would read an html file, which would
be displayed using eww. However, the keybindings and search/navigation logic
would be based on that of info mode.
On a plain terminal, info could either create a fresh window, or it
could delegate to 'emacs -nw'.
There’s a side issue, which is that HTML documentation tends to take
quite a lot of space, but we’ll see whether that’s a problem.
It does require some more space, but it should compress fairly well.
What I do for the Kawa manual is generate an 'epub' archive, which is
basically a zip archive, with compression. It is fairly simple for a
web server to extract a zip member and send it to a browser directly
as a gzip-compressed file, without actually decompressing the file
(until it gets to the browser). I contributed support for this to
https://libwebsockets.org/, which is a compact C-language http server.
DomTerm uses this to "serve" the JavaScript files to the browser,
and a revamped 'info' program could do the same.
--
--Per Bothner
address@hidden http://per.bothner.com/
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, (continued)
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Per Bothner, 2019/04/02
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Gavin Smith, 2019/04/08
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/04/08
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2019/04/08
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Gavin Smith, 2019/04/08
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Eli Zaretskii, 2019/04/09
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Gavin Smith, 2019/04/13
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Pronaip, 2019/04/14
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/04/03
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Gavin Smith, 2019/04/04
Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?,
Per Bothner <=
Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/04/02
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/04/02
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Per Bothner, 2019/04/02
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, sirgazil, 2019/04/02
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, Gavin Smith, 2019/04/03
- Re: Any interest in using HTML for locally-installed Texinfo documentation?, sirgazil, 2019/04/03