|
From: | Per Bothner |
Subject: | Re: styling flexibility for definitions |
Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2020 07:42:12 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.3.1 |
On 10/30/20 6:34 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2020 at 05:05:28AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:On 10/30/20 12:13 AM, Gavin Smith wrote: I don't think there is a strong reason to not use non-standard attributes: It's fully supported by javascript and css. There are a couple of minor reasons (validation becomes more complicated without a custom DTD, and there is a small chance they might clash with a future standard or browser extension), and some people disapprove of them.Why not simply use another class?
One could use a separate class for each category. For example: <dt class="synopsis Function"> or: <dt class="synopsis category-function"> However, that would seem to require a distinct CSS style for each category. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |