[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: html structure revisited
From: |
Per Bothner |
Subject: |
Re: html structure revisited |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Feb 2021 13:28:46 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 |
On 2/15/21 5:41 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Hello,
I had a look at the result when there is no node, with a document like
Note the patch in your reply, which probably was a reply to this:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2021-02/msg00042.html
*did* test $command->{'extra'}->{'associated_node'}.
However, that doesn't seem to have have made it into the checked-in version.
--
--Per Bothner
per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
- Re: formatting_fr_icons test, (continued)
- Re: html structure revisited, Gavin Smith, 2021/02/14
- Re: html structure revisited, Gavin Smith, 2021/02/14
- Re: html structure revisited, Per Bothner, 2021/02/14
- Re: html structure revisited, Gavin Smith, 2021/02/14
- Re: html structure revisited, Patrice Dumas, 2021/02/15
- Re: html structure revisited, Gavin Smith, 2021/02/15
- Re: html structure revisited, Patrice Dumas, 2021/02/19
- Re: html structure revisited,
Per Bothner <=
- Re: html structure revisited, Patrice Dumas, 2021/02/16
- Re: html structure revisited, Gavin Smith, 2021/02/15
- Re: html structure revisited, Per Bothner, 2021/02/15
- Re: html structure revisited, Gavin Smith, 2021/02/20
- Re: html structure revisited, Per Bothner, 2021/02/20
- Re: html structure revisited, Patrice Dumas, 2021/02/19