Re: html structure revisited

[Patrice Dumas]

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 01:28:46PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:
> On 2/15/21 5:41 AM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I had a look at the result when there is no node, with a document like
> 
> Note the patch in your reply, which probably was a reply to this:
> 
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-texinfo/2021-02/msg00042.html
> 
> *did* test $command->{'extra'}->{'associated_node'}.

Indeed, but not for the objective I want to use that key.  In your patch
it was used to find the node, in my proposal, it is to find whether or
not there is a node associated and then define section differently.  I
have not tested with the original patch, but I am pretty sure that the
issue I reported arised with it too.

> However, that doesn't seem to have have made it into the checked-in version.

Indeed, Gavin removed that part to keep a span for nodes.

-- 
Pat