bug-texinfo
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: footer navigation headers


From: Patrice Dumas
Subject: Re: footer navigation headers
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2021 00:21:23 +0100

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 10:05:16PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 05:18:18PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> > This is not easy to determine which warning to output since the node is
> > automatically added during output.  I think that we have two
> > possibilities, 
> > * pass to Structuring.pm the information that nodes will be generated 
> >   automatically and add a special case for nodes in generated menus.  
> > * modify the tree before or in Texinfo::Structuring::nodes_tree().
> 
> The warnings that are output are a
> regression from texi2any 6.7 which managed files like these with
> no problem.

I agree, this needs to be fixed.

What about first removing those unreferenced warnings when FORMAT_MENU
is mini_toc?  We know that in that case there will be spurious warnings
of menus are omitted.

> Maybe CHECK_NORMAL_MENU_STRUCTURE would do most of the job?

I just tested, and it doesn't seems to add new warnings.
 
> A node could also be referenced through a cross-reference and I
> don't think the existing code checks for this.  I know we discussed
> this a few months ago and I worry we are going over the same ground
> again.

We discussed a lot on that subject, but I do not remember going over
that argument of cross references.  I think that I can check if the
node is the target of cross references and do not warn in that case.

> I don't like the idea of transforming the entire tree to add menus
> by default as this would be unnecessary processing.

I forgot to say that my proposal would be to do that for Info output 
only, for which it is done anyway during the output.  Would that be ok?

> 
> > > For HTML output, they are referenced in the
> > > sectional tables of contents. I didn't check with other values of
> > > FORMAT_MENU. I will have to check what the default value of
> > > FORMAT_MENU is and what errors are output for each setting.
> > 
> > I checked that with FORMAT_MENU set to menu or nomenu in HTML, the 
> > node will actually be unreferenced.  I am not sure what to do with
> > nomenu, if FORMAT_MENU=mini_toc, it would make sense to consider that
> > all the nodes associated with sectioning commands are referenced.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]