|
From: | Per Bothner |
Subject: | Re: definition styling |
Date: | Thu, 4 Mar 2021 12:53:11 -0800 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 |
On 3/4/21 12:21 PM, Gavin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Mar 03, 2021 at 02:27:09PM -0800, Per Bothner wrote:However, the link can removed with the configuration option -c JS_WEBLABELS=omit. Which seems to work for me.It's up to you if you do this but this appears to negate the purpose of the LibreJS initiative. Even if you hid it with CSS, then a browser plugin could still find the link.
As far as I can tell, the LibreJS plugin is orthogonal to the link, and does not depend on it. I'm guessing the plugin checks for copyright notices in JavaScript files loaded by a web page/application. It would be pointless to depend on the absence or presence of a link. I don't feel strongly about removing the link or hiding it with CSS, but I see little-to-no benefit in generating the license page and then hiding the link. -- --Per Bothner per@bothner.com http://per.bothner.com/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |