[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span> |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Dec 2021 23:03:00 +0100 |
On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 06:33:15PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
>
> Also I propose to add class to the anchors to distinguish their source.
I integrated the separate anchor of @float to the div, so I added the
following classes for separate anchors:
"anchor" for @anchor, "index-entry-anchor" for @cindex and similar @*index
index entry @-commands, "node-anchor" for a @node without associated sectioning
command, and "top-anchor" for an empty @top.
If those classes are considered to add too much verbosity, it should be
easy to remove them, as I added a formatting function that centralizes
the formatting of separate anchors.
--
Pat
- use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Patrice Dumas, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Per Bothner, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Patrice Dumas, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Per Bothner, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Gavin Smith, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Patrice Dumas, 2021/12/26
- Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2021/12/26
Re: use <a> for hancors without content, not <span>,
Patrice Dumas <=