[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: When should we put @key inside @kbd?
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: When should we put @key inside @kbd? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jan 2022 00:19:28 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Sun, Jan 02, 2022 at 03:38:39PM -0700, Karl Berry wrote:
> @kbd{@key{TAB}}
>
> Indeed. A feature specifically requested, of course. Implemented by rms
> in 1989. (Or maybe I sent the patch and rms installed it, no idea any more.)
> Ah, for the days of apple-gunkies ...
>
> Mon Aug 28 00:21:33 1989 Richard Stallman (rms at apple-gunkies.ai.mit.edu)
> [...]
> * texinfo.tex (\kbd): If arg consists of one \key command, be a no op.
>
> I didn't find any discussion of
> @key inside @kbd in particular.
>
> There is a thread in bug-texinfo in March 2018, and some mention in
> earlier years. (Just grepping for kbd.*key and key.*kbd in the
> *texinfo/* mailing list archives; didn't try to read all the msgs.)
> Probably yet more from before the archives begin.
Obviously I did made some attempt to find what the rationale/past
thinking was. The March 2018 discussion was the one I linked to.
I missed the ChangeLog entry from 1989 but there is no explanation
there anyway. Overall I feel I did more research on this than could
be reasonably expected.
> Anyway, we could spend more time looking up past history, but it sounds
> like all the decisions have been made, so why bother ... certainly not
> anything I want to spend more time exhuming. --happy hacking, karl.
It needs relevant arguments rather than a general statement that the issue
has been discussed or decided in the past.