question about a class for list without mark @itemize @w

[Patrice Dumas]

Hello,

I modified the @itemize output in HTML to use CSS to set the items
(with list-style-type).  For that classes are added corresponding to the
commands in argument of @itemize.  For example

@itemize @minus

whill lead to

 <ul class="mark-minus">

with definition of (2212 is the unicode point for minus)
 
 ul.mark-minus {list-style-type: "\2212"}

In the Texinfo manual it is explicitly said that @w{} corresponds to no
mark at all "If you don't want any mark at all, but still want logical
items, use '@w{}'".  Right now

@itemize @w{} corresponds to the class mark-w with

 ul.mark-w {list-style-type: none}

I am not sure that it is the best as it is not seen in the class name
that it corresponds to no mark at all.  Maybe something like no-mark
or mark-none would be better.

Any opinion on that subject?

-- 
Pat