Re: question about a class for list without mark @itemize @w

[Gavin Smith]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 11:31:45AM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 09:20:28PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> > 
> > I think mark-none would be fine.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > I saw no-bullet was being used in the current output; that would be okay
> > too.  (See below.)
> 
> I would prefer to replace it with more semantic classes, but we will
> see.
> 
> > But it doesn't matter that much as nothing uses these class names.
> 
> It does, as we want to make it easy for users to develop their own CSS
> styling, and for that there need to be class names, rules about classes
> that make them easy to understand and use.
> 
> > I don't know how hard it would be but I think it would be nice only
> > to output the required CSS in HTML files.
> 
> Keeping track of the CSS use is easy as all the CSS should go through
> go through html_attribute_class().  Outputting the CSS block after the rest
> of the file has been generated can only be done, I think, by holding off
> any output before the very end, even when split.  I can try to do it
> that way.

I think I had a similar problem with MathJax, only referencing the
JavaScript file if actually needed.

> Note that a similar issue arises with LaTeX output, the packages needed
> depend on the @-commands used, maybe it would be good to the something
> similar for the LaTeX output to determine the header at the end.

That would be a good idea as it would make the output more reliable by
not relying on as many LaTeX packages.