[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Feature request: api docs
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: Feature request: api docs |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2022 13:21:59 +0000 |
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 01:07:53PM +0000, Reißner Ernst wrote:
> I think, if all is happy with that solution, we shall implement along the
> same line, right?
Somebody has to work out all the details. And it may be, once the
problem is understood, that recommending another system like Doxygen might
be the outcome rather than extending Texinfo.
There would have to be a tool to extract the documentation from the source
files. Since we're not going to write this tool perhaps working with
Doxygen (or another system) would be necessary.
Re: Feature request: api docs, Patrice Dumas, 2022/02/04
- AW: Feature request: api docs, Reißner Ernst, 2022/02/07
- Re: Feature request: api docs, Patrice Dumas, 2022/02/19
- AW: Feature request: api docs, Reißner Ernst, 2022/02/22
- Re: AW: Feature request: api docs, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2022/02/23
- Re: AW: Feature request: api docs, Ernst Reissner, 2022/02/24
- Re: AW: Feature request: api docs, Jacob Bachmeyer, 2022/02/25