Re: correctly placed @part before @node can be in ignored Top node

[Patrice Dumas]

On Sun, Mar 13, 2022 at 07:11:11PM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
> I think it makes sense to consider the node to end at the @part command.

I agree, and that is what I actually assumed for DocBook code (not
related to ignoring Top node but more in link with where @part content
should appear).

> Do you think you can do something similar for texi2any, i.e. not include
> the @part line in the preceding node?

I'll do that.  Hopefully it only implies changing the association with
tree units, but I'll see.

> > If, instead, the @part is between the @node and @chapter, the output is
> > correct in TeX, HTML, and DocBookbut this is not what is expected.
> > 
> >  @node Top
> >  @top top
> > 
> >  @node chapter node
> >  @part Part I
> >  @chapter chapter
> > 
> >  @bye
> 
> Perhaps there will be no need for this unusual ordering.

Indeed.

-- 
Pat