[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rethinking @def*
From: |
pertusus |
Subject: |
Re: rethinking @def* |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2022 19:02:45 +0200 |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 04:58:10PM +0000, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> Compare this to a C library 'foo' that wants to have a stable ABI for
> all of its functions, making older programs link and run successfully
> with newer library versions: it is impossible to change any public
> header files without breaking it.[*] Obviously, I equate the ABI with
> texinfo's output formatting.
That's here that we differ. To me the ABI is more like the syntax, and
the semantics, the formatting is the implementation.
--
Pat
- Re: rethinking @def*, (continued)
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*,
pertusus <=
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/27
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/27
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/27
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/27
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/28