[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rethinking @def*
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: rethinking @def* |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jul 2022 15:32:59 +0100 |
On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 01:57:27PM +0100, Gavin Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 12:53:53AM +0200, pertusus@free.fr wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I did an implementation in LaTeX.
> >
> > A first possible issue. In non @deftype*, @code around metasyntactical
> > separators (bracket or parentheses) causes the metasyntactical
> > separators to become slanted. It is consistent, putting in @code remove
> > the automatic upright, but it is not very intuitive, as @code turns non
> > slanted to slanted.
> >
> > With the first line, [ are upright typewriter. With the second line,
> > [ are slanted typewriter:
> >
> > @defspec foobar (var [from to [inc]]) default
> > @defspecx foobar (var @code{[}from to @code{[}inc@code{]]}) code
>
> I got the first line as slanted roman, not upright typewriter?
> git rev 4fe154fa033fa9c.
I got your more recent commits. It is as you said. I agree that this
is wrong.
- Re: rethinking @def*, (continued)
- Re: rethinking @def*, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/07/26
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/28
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/28
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/28
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/28
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*,
Gavin Smith <=
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/29
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, pertusus, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31
- Re: rethinking @def*, Gavin Smith, 2022/07/31