[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: url protection
From: |
Gavin Smith |
Subject: |
Re: url protection |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2022 21:05:11 +0100 |
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:11:05AM -0700, Per Bothner wrote:
> > I think that we should support setting the output encoding explictly to
> > a Texinfo supported encoding for a long time, even it UTF-8 becomes the
> > default output encoding for HTML.
>
> Why? Is this useful for anything?
I don't think it's worth pursuing this argument without a practical
reason to drop support. This means more work to implement it and
possible disruption. There is enough work to be done in the project
to be done before the next release so we don't need to be spending time
on this as well.
- url protection, Patrice Dumas, 2022/08/03
- Re: url protection, Per Bothner, 2022/08/03
- Re: url protection, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/04
- Message not available
- Re: url protection, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/08/05
- Re: url protection, Patrice Dumas, 2022/08/05
- Re: url protection, Per Bothner, 2022/08/05
- Re: url protection, Gavin Smith, 2022/08/04
- Re: url protection, Patrice Dumas, 2022/08/04
- Re: url protection, Gavin Smith, 2022/08/05
- Re: url protection, Patrice Dumas, 2022/08/05
Re: url protection, Gavin Smith, 2022/08/05