[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: microtype for texinfo
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: microtype for texinfo |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2022 15:28:36 -0600 |
gavin> Is it the same story with lmodern which is another frequently
recommended font package?
I don't know. Norbert, is lm a recommends in Debian? That might be
enough reason to \usepackage{lmodern} by default. If not, for the sake
of minimalism, I would suggest just sticking with the default fonts,
meaning [T1] and EC/cm-super.
cm-super contains cyrillic and lm doesn't.
OTOH, there's a claim that lm has more accented and other assorted glyphs.
https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/1390/
I don't imagine either of these are critical factors for Texinfo.
Best,
Karl
- Re: microtype for texinfo, (continued)
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Karl Berry, 2022/09/29
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Norbert Preining, 2022/09/29
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Werner LEMBERG, 2022/09/30
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Norbert Preining, 2022/09/30
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Patrice Dumas, 2022/09/30
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Gavin Smith, 2022/09/30
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Patrice Dumas, 2022/09/30
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Gavin Smith, 2022/09/30
- Re: microtype for texinfo,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: microtype for texinfo, Karl Berry, 2022/09/30