[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
behavior of @math with HTML output
From: |
Vincent Lefevre |
Subject: |
behavior of @math with HTML output |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2022 00:40:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.7+47 (8681885b) vl-149028 (2022-10-10) |
The Texinfo manual says
The '@math' command has no special effect on the Info output or (by
default) the HTML output, merely outputting the contents verbatim.
However, as said later, the contents are emphasized (with <em>).
So the description is inconsistent.
Moreover, using <em> is incorrect because things like digits should
not be in italics. For instance, with the GMP manual, one has about
mpz_mul_2exp (since r3083): "op1 times 2 raised to op2" entirely in
italics. There are no reasons to do that. This was added in 2000;
I don't know what texinfo did at that time...
The GNU MPFR manual has the same issues as being based on the style
of the GMP manual.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
- behavior of @math with HTML output,
Vincent Lefevre <=
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/12
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/14
- incorrect @math spacing for PDF output with an empty macro, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/14
- Re: incorrect @math spacing for PDF output with an empty macro, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/14