[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: behavior of @math with HTML output
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: behavior of @math with HTML output |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Oct 2022 11:22:22 +0200 |
On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 12:40:12AM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> The Texinfo manual says
>
> The '@math' command has no special effect on the Info output or (by
> default) the HTML output, merely outputting the contents verbatim.
>
> However, as said later, the contents are emphasized (with <em>).
> So the description is inconsistent.
The correct description is that the contents are emphasized. I agree
that the manual could be changed.
> Moreover, using <em> is incorrect because things like digits should
> not be in italics. For instance, with the GMP manual, one has about
> mpz_mul_2exp (since r3083): "op1 times 2 raised to op2" entirely in
> italics. There are no reasons to do that. This was added in 2000;
> I don't know what texinfo did at that time...
Most likely <em>.
There are now other options for math formatting in HTML, but they are
suitable for TeX/LaTeX math, not much for text describing math. If I
understand well your need, I think that using CSS to change how @math is
formatted is probably the best with --css-include. And probably
something like
em.math { font-family:inherit }
It is possible that in 6.8 there is no math class, but in the upcoming
release there is.
--
Pat
- behavior of @math with HTML output, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/11
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output,
Patrice Dumas <=
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/13
- Re: behavior of @math with HTML output, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/14
- incorrect @math spacing for PDF output with an empty macro, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/14
- Re: incorrect @math spacing for PDF output with an empty macro, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/14
- Re: incorrect @math spacing for PDF output with an empty macro, Vincent Lefevre, 2022/10/14