[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Oct 2022 19:36:42 +0300 |
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: Gavin Smith <GavinSmith0123@gmail.com>, Texinfo <bug-texinfo@gnu.org>,
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 18:22:03 +0200
>
> >>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:47:43 +0200, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr>
> >>>>> said:
> Gavin> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 01:20:19PM +0200, Robert Pluim wrote:
> >> >> platforms, Emacs can yank these objects with the @code{yank-media}
> >> >> command---but only in modes that have support for it
> (@w{@pxref{Yanking
> >> >> Media,,, elisp, The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual}}).
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there a reason for this new warning?
> >>
> Gavin> I don't see any problem with putting @pxref inside @w. In my
> opinion
> Gavin> it should be fine to put any Texinfo commands that occur inside
> Gavin> paragraphs inside @w. This was a very recent change (2022-10-02).
>
> Patrice> I imagined that @*ref in @w could only be mistake, as would also
> be
> Patrice> 'titlefont', 'anchor', 'footnote', 'verb', 'xref', 'ref',
> 'pxref',
> Patrice> 'inforef'.
>
> Patrice> I can change such as to have @w contain anything that can happen
> in a
> Patrice> paragraph.
>
> I think that would be good. Eli has good taste in this sort of
> stuff. Eli?
I was surprised to hear that @w is used around a cross-reference. I
admit I still don't understand the need: AFAIK all the viewers for all
the output formats can cope with a reference that is broken between
two lines? So what exactly is the rationale for this usage?
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/21