[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest
From: |
Robert Pluim |
Subject: |
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest |
Date: |
Fri, 21 Oct 2022 09:45:32 +0200 |
>>>>> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 17:42:18 +0200, Patrice Dumas <pertusus@free.fr> said:
>> I guess we could use @w for "The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual"
>> there (but I never read emacs docs in html, so Iʼm the wrong person to
>> offer an opinion).
Patrice> I think that it would avoid more unwanted break in HTML, though
there
Patrice> could still be. But I think that the main issue is whether, in a
Patrice> printed manual, not breaking in "The Emacs Lisp Reference Manual"
gives
Patrice> the wanted results, that triggered using @w in the first place.
To be honest, Iʼd have no issue with that phrase being broken over two
lines in a printed manual, and as Eli has pointed out in a different
message itʼs unnecessary to break in info and html.
Robert
--
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, (continued)
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/20
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/20
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/20
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/20
- Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Robert Pluim, 2022/10/21
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/20
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/21
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/21
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/21
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Patrice Dumas, 2022/10/22
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Gavin Smith, 2022/10/22
Re: texinfo-6.8.90 pretest, Eli Zaretskii, 2022/10/22